Annerly Poulos vs Koral Koldobski Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W W L L W
Form
L L W L W L L L L LHead-2-Head: Poulos 1 - 0 Koldobski
They have played 2 sets in total, with Poulos winning 2 and Koldobski winning 0. The last match between Poulos and Koldobski was at the W15 Antalya, 11-05-2022, First, Clay with Annerly Poulos getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Annerly Poulos | 1 |
| Koral Koldobski | 0 |
W15 Antalya(11-05-2022)
6
3
7
5
| Poulos | Stats | Koldobski |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | Ret. |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 22 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 50% (28-28) | Career Total W/L | 35% (35-64) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Baez VS Dzumhur PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Pegula VS Lys PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Annerly Poulos
Player
Koral Koldobski
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
8
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:45:0 | Average Match Time | 1:45:0 |
| 52% (32/62) | 1st Serve % | 60% (43/72) |
| 75% (24/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (26/43) |
| 47% (14/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (11/29) |
| 31% (5/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (3/3) |
| 49% (35/72) | Return Points Win % | 39% (24/62) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Annerly Poulos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Lara Walker
Player
Annerly Poulos
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
43%
(
28 of
65)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 1-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Annerly Poulos
51%
(
38 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Annerly Poulos
Player
Diana Maria Mihail
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 | def. | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Koral Koldobski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Shira Chiche
Player
Koral Koldobski
41%
(
26 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
58
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 1-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Shay Fadlon
Player
Koral Koldobski
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
10
43%
(
17 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
56%
(
37 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 1-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Annerly Poulos
Player
Koral Koldobski
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
8
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Doga Turkmen
Player
Koral Koldobski
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iulia Andreea Ionescu
Player
Koral Koldobski
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Koral Koldobski
Player
Anna Rahman
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Giulia Sartori
Player
Koral Koldobski
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
45%
(
15 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
58%
(
36 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 1-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50% (28/28) | Win/Loss | 35% (35/64) |
| 50% (57/56) | Sets Win/Loss | 37% (80/135) |
| 51% (502/488) | Games Win/Loss | 43% (819/1067) |
| 51% (21/20) | Hard Win/Loss | 39% (29/45) |
| 42% (5/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 24% (6/19) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 82 | Aces Total | 22 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 137 | Total Double Faults | 217 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 371.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 279 |
| 54% (1175/2162) | 1st Serve % | 62% (1148/1853) |
| 61% (719/1175) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (601/1148) |
| 45% (446/987) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (252/705) |
| 43% (119/278) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (101/207) |
| 43% (882/2033) | Return Points Win % | 44% (810/1839) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (14/17) | Challenger W/L | 39% (7/11) |
| 58% (14/10) | Futures W/L | 35% (28/53) |
| 50% (27/54) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 35% (35/99) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 20% (1/5) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 50% (2/4) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (7/17) |
| 93% (28/26) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (39/33) |
| 7% (28/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (39/6) |
| 7% (27/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 3% (60/2) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
